A message from Rabbi
Eliezer Ben Yehuda
Jacksonville Beaches, Florida
Matot - Masa'ey
| 5759 This week we read a double portion in the Torah, which contains the last chapters in the book of Bamidbar, Numbers the fourth and concluding book of the Torah. "Now," you may say to me, "just you wait a minute! There are five books in the Torah, and you have just stated that this was the end of the fourth. So, how can you say concluding' book?" I would remind you that the last book, Devarim, is called Deuteronomy, the "second telling." It is, in effect, a summary of the events presided upon by our great leader and teacher, the man of God, Moses Moshe Ben Amram. So what I say is quite so this week's portion is the "end of the story" of the travels and teaching of the children of Israel in the desert. The last chapter -- the last word' of Moshe Rabeinu, inspired by God himself. . . One would think that it would contain a summary of what took place, or else it would contain a great truth, a paramount wisdom, the synthesis and distillation -- the very essence of all the insight and discernment God gave to Moshe. Yet, that is not the case. Instead, we find our brethren, the Children of Israel, raising an issue that, at least on the face of it, seems to be no more than a corollary to an issue that was raised and that had been settled by God Himself earlier in their travels. It all began with some orphaned women approaching Moshe: "Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph; and these are the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah. And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, by the door of the Tent of Meeting, saying, "Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of those who gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons. Why should the name of our father be taken away from among his family, because he had no sons? Give to us therefore a possession among the brothers of our father." And Moses brought their cause before the Lord." [Num. 27:1-5] The issue was not merely one of some unfortunate women who, having lost their male protector and head of the family, wanted to inherit the portion of their father! In the time of the exodus and the desert travels, women had no rights in the existing patriarchal society. Men ruled, particularly heads of households. Women were bought and sold in what was called marriage,' or as servants or slaves, to be at the mercy of their owner.' Thus we begin to understand that the issue is nothing less than the rights of women and their place in Israelite society! That is why Moshe does not respond of his own wisdom and understanding, but rather asks for Divine guidance. Whatever the answer was going be, he knew, there must never be any doubt about the source and authority of the legislation! I will remind you that God did reply and favor the daughters of Zelophehad: "And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, "The daughters of Zelophehad speak right; you shall surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father's brothers; and you shall cause the inheritance of their father to pass to them. And you shall speak to the people of Israel, saying, If a man dies, and has no son, then you shall cause his inheritance to pass to his daughter." [Num. 27:6-8] This instruction from God Himself set a standard among the Israelites that established for all times that women are fully equal members of the Israelite society, with rights of property, which by inference means all rights! They had to be given due consideration and protection in a time when most of mankind gave them less regard than was given to a strong mule or fine milk producing cow! Because of this precedence, women obtained a ketubah, marriage contract, and were equal partners, if not indeed the authority, in the conduct of the Israelite household. Even though Israelite society was patriarchal is nature, women shared power in public as well as in the home as evidenced by the roles of Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel and Leah as well as Miriam and Deborah, Hanna, mother of Samuel, and even non Israelite women such as Ya'el, the Kenite, and Ruth, the Moabite. With the rights of women established, there was an unasked question remaining: were these rights merely a concession to the women, or did they carry with them a corollary obligation? This is a fundamental question, and actually may be seen as one that has never been truly addressed by Torah up to this point. Now, in today's portion we read, "And the chief fathers of the families of the sons of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near, and spoke before Moses, and before the princes, the chief fathers of the people of Israel; And they said, The Lord commanded my lord to give the land for an inheritance by lot to the people of Israel; and my lord was commanded by the Lord to give the inheritance of Zelophehad our brother to his daughters. And if they are married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the people of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be given to the inheritance of the tribe where they are received; so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance. And when the jubilee of the people of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be given to the inheritance of the tribe where they are received; so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers." [Num 36 1:4] What we have here is not merely a question of members of one tribe as to land rights that may be lost for their kin. Indeed what we have here is a question of obligations that come with right! If the daughters of Zelophehad are "just women" who may choose to marry for love or comfort then they get more rights than men, since men have a tribal and familial obligation to carry on. If the daughters of Zelophehad are to inherit with the men, do they not have an obligation to carry on tribal and familial obligations as the men do? Once again, Moshe gives an answer that has been rendered by God, as we read, "And Moses commanded the people of Israel according to the word of the Lord, saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph has said well. This is the thing which the Lord does command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry. So shall not the inheritance of the people of Israel move from tribe to tribe; for every one of the people of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers. And every daughter, who possesses an inheritance in any tribe of the people of Israel, shall be the wife to one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the people of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers." [Num 36 5:8] This answer marries freedom with responsibility. It allows the daughters of Zelophehad to choose husbands but it restricts their freedom by their tribal inheritance rules' which is to say, they must marry within the tribe so as not to compromise the territorial apportioning that was to remain for ever' for the Children of Israel in their tribes by the gift of God. From this ruling we learn that God has placed on us a benevolent and equanimous Torah that allows all to live protected by God's love and law, and that those who choose to enter into a position of responsibility, leadership, and rights of ownership, must also be bound by the obligations of this responsibility, be they male or female. Women's rights are guaranteed - but freedom exacts a toll, and rights are only one side of the coin of duty. May we always rejoice in God's teaching, and may we know how to live in His grace by learning His Torah and walking its path. Amen
5760 This weeks portion of the Torah text, which is the double portion Matot - Masaey, in the book of Bemidbar chapter 30:2 to 36:13 is the last segment in the book. The most important matter raised is, possibly, the matter of the cities of refuge, a new and revolutionary concept in the days of the giving of the Torah: if a person takes a life bishgaga by mistake, as the Torah puts it, he can escape to a designated place of refuge, where he is guaranteed a fair trial, and, if he is found guiltless of premeditation in his crime, sanctuary from the blood-avengers. The importance of this issue in the teachings of Judaism can be gleaned from the fact that it is mentioned four times in the Torah in Exodus 21, in our portion this week, in Deuteronomy 4 and again in Deuteronomy 19. The actual establishment of these cities of refuge is mentioned both in Joshua, chapters 20 and 21, and in first Chronicles 40. I believe that this issue is related to the general sanctity in which Judaism holds all life, be it the animals of the field and forest, the beasts of burden and labor and the ones we raise to use as food. It was this attitude toward life that motivated Israels late Prime minister, Yitzkhak Rabin, to speak clearly and resolutely in the Rose Garden of the White House seven years ago, [let there be] no more war, no more killing. This feeling that life is the most precious gift of God is not necessarily shared by Israels interlocutors. The recent collapse of the Camp David summit was a great step backwards for Palestinian aspirations, and they have no one to blame except their own attitude and their leadership that is not oriented to consider life precious. Ehud Barak returned home weakened politically for making concessions that were not recognized for their magnanimity but that will be remembered the next time a summit is convened. His coalition partners are deserting the ship of peace the more illusive it becomes, and conceivably the next summit will see a new leader at the helm of Israels ship of state. Yasser Arafat, master survivor of a lifetime of byzantine intrigues against his life and his cause, received a hero's welcome in Gaza. Yet the true losers of the failure at Camp David are the Palestinian people. The unique and unprecedented thing that happened at Camp David was that for the first time since the last crossing of Israels red lines and negotiating with the chief terrorists that had been plotting Israels destruction, an Israeli leader was ready to discuss openly concessions that until now have been totally taboo. Arafat could have returned from Camp David with an Israeli - and US - recognition of a Palestinian state in 90% of the territory of the West Bank and Gaza including the Jordan valley, some Jewish settlements would have been dismantled, and for others which would not, a land exchange would have been worked out. Furthermore, Palestinian villages around Jerusalem, incorporated within Israeli sovereignty in l967, would have been annexed to the Palestinian state, and some Palestinian presence would have been acknowledged within the Arab quarters of Jerusalem itself . And, what is even more amazing to believe, an Israeli prime minister, for the first time, was ready seriously to consider the right of return of l948 Arab refugees (which the Arabs claim number four millions), though it had been suggested that the Arabs will choose to accept compensation in place of repatriation. Or not! Arafat rejected these offers, and came back to a heros welcome empty-handed, and no military parades in Gaza or rhetorical flourishes can obliterate the fact that a legitimate and internationally recognized state has been in Arafat's reach - and he let the opportunity slip through his hands because of his basic unwillingness to consider serious compromises. Some claim that it is the Arab world and the Moslem world that forced his hand. They would not condone, would not allow him to yield. Such claims evoke echoes of l947 - when the Palestinians could have achieved a state of their own in a divided British Mandatory Palestine as envisaged in the UN partition decision - but chose to join the holy war of fellow Arab states to drive the Jews into the sea. In war they were defeated, and at the armistice negotiations they were shunned and forgotten, left to suffer the bitter fruit of being vanquished alone and ignored. There was the chance to redress the wrong of 48 in 1967, when Israel sued for peace again after the smashing victory of the Six Days War - only to be rejected and rebuffed by the Khartoum resolution of no recognition of Israel and no negotiations with it. Finally, as late as l977 - when they could have joined Sadat's courageous initiative, grab the offer of Palestinian autonomy, and later a state, wish would have been established decades ago. I am not sure who said it, but it has been stated that Arafat never misses the chance to miss a chance. He just could not concede the price of a Camp David compromise: a final Palestinian renunciation of any future claims against Israel. The failure of the Camp David summit makes it very clear that the Palestinian leadership allows itself to hang on to utopian dreams in which they push the Jews into the sea and establish a secular Arab state of Palestine in the entire area of the former British mandate. This kind of dream condemns the negotiation discourse to futility and failure. Camp David was a great step backwards for the peace camp and for Palestinians aspirations. It was a tragedy for Israelis who love peace and pursue it, and a catastrophe to the chances of peace and reconciliation in the area.
Matot-Masaey 5761 This is a special Shabbat for a couple of reasons: First, it is Rosh Khodesh Av. The beginning of the eleventh month of the Jewish year. Rosh Khodesh is always special in our tradition - it is a "mini new year" as it were. A time to rejoyce and a time to take stock of our life and our circustances. This week we read a double portion in the Torah, which contains the last chapters in the book of Bamidbar, Numbers which is the fourth and concluding book of the narrative of the Torah. I am sure I dont have to explain that the last book, Devarim, which is called "Deuteronomy," meaning the "second telling," is, in effect, a summary of the events presided upon by our great leader and teacher, the man of God, Moses Moshe Ben Amram. I must tell you that I love Rosh Khodesh - it is the occasion for singing the Hallel, a part of the service that I enjoy because of its content as well as because of the fact that we doing so infrequently. However, Rosh Khodesh Av is different, for it is the last fresh breath before the dark countdown to Tisha bAv, the infamous disaster day of Jewish history. But we wont touch this subject - well leave it for next week. Today we shall celebrate - khazak, khazak! Be strong, yes strong we say as we finish reading the weeks portion, as we complete the lesson of our beloved prophet, our teacher Moshe. Khazak venitkhazek - we shall become strong by the strength of our Torah, our heritage of the inspired word of God, of the teaching of love and justice, of kindness and Godliness, of mercy and compassion. We shall rejoice with words from the Psalms of David, "The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone. This is the LORD'S doing; It is marvelous in our eyes. This is the day which the LORD has made; Let us rejoice and be glad in it." [Psalms 118:22-24] The story of mankind began, in the Torah, with Adam and Eve - and almost ended with their offsprings, Cain and Hevel. You recall, I am sure, "And Cain talked with Abel his brother; and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him." [Gen. 4:8] Many people call this "the first murder" - but how could it be? There had been no death ever before. Cain responded to Gods query "I know not." And, indeed , he did not know! In this weeks Torah portion we read that in cases where death occurs without malice, the killer must not be put to death. The Israelites established cities of refuge, where a man could hide from those who wish to avenge a death. A person had to stand trial and it had to be proven that the death was totally "bishgaga"- by accident. When that occurred, and the accused was found to have had no malice for the victim - his punishment was that he could not leave the refuge for a very long time. He was exiled, cut off from his loved ones, living with his deed and its subsequent loneliness. How different from some societies that view the cycle of violence and death as inevitable, who live by the sword and perish by the sword. "Hodu ladonay ki tov, ki leolam khasdo - O give thanks to the Lord; for he is good; because his loving kindness endures for ever. Let Israel now say, that his loving kindness endures for ever. Let the house of Aaron now say, that his loving kindness endures for ever. Let now those who fear the Lord say, that his loving kindness endures for ever." [Psalms 118:1-4] Matot Masa'ey 5762 This week we read a double portion in the
Torah, which contains the last chapters in the book of Bamidbar, Numbers
the fourth book of the Torah. We are also celebrating the birthday
of our country. Matot Masa'ey 5763 This Shabbat sees the ending and a beginning.
We read the double portion, Matot-Masa'ey, which brings to an end
the fourth book of the "Khumash" - the five books of Moses.
In the afternoon on Shabbat, congregations begin reading the fifth
book, Dvarim - the "last will and testament" of our great
teacher and liberator, Moshe. Thus, in effect, we are finishing this
shabbat the reading of the story of Israel's great journey from humble
birth as the "seed of Abraham" to the twelve tribes with
Levites and Cohanim entering the Land of their Inheritance, which
will forever after be known as the Land of Israel. Shabbat shalom
|
Visit The Jacksonville Beaches Synagogue web page:
http://usawebs.net/beachesynagogue/
Have a great and blessed day, whichever way you celebrate it.
Comments will be very much appreciated.
Have a good week-end, one and all!
You may mail your comments to: Rabbi Eliezer Ben Yehuda
![]()
Listed With HaReshima: The list of Jewish
sites on the Web